A Complete Reference Guide | The IEP Coach
This reference guide outlines the nine essential components that must be included in every Individualized Education Program (IEP) to ensure legal compliance under IDEA. Each section includes the legal requirement, practical examples, and best practice tips.
Describes current performance in academics and functional areas. Must be data-driven with concrete strengths and needs. Shows how the disability affects access to the general curriculum.
Include baseline data, teacher input, and evaluation results. Must connect directly to goals and services.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(1)
Reading: Michael is a 6th-grade student reading at a mid-3rd grade level according to his most recent Fountas & Pinnell assessment (Level N). He can decode CVC and CCVC words with 85% accuracy but struggles with multisyllabic words. Michael requires repeated modeling to comprehend nonfiction text. His disability affects his ability to access grade-level curriculum without accommodations such as read-aloud and guided reading support.
Functional: Michael demonstrates age-appropriate social skills but has difficulty initiating tasks independently. He completes independent assignments with adult prompting in 4 out of 5 trials.
Avoid vague phrases like "below grade level." Use measurable, current language that clearly outlines where the student is right now.
Define what the student is expected to achieve in 12 months. Must be specific and measurable. Must directly align with the PLAAFP.
Include a baseline, target, and method of measurement. Ensure it's appropriate and ambitious for the student's needs.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(2)
Goal: Given a 5th-grade expository text, Michael will identify the main idea and at least two supporting details with 80% accuracy in 4 out of 5 trials by March 2026.
Structure:
Use the SMART framework: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound.
Describes all specially designed instruction and related services. Must include frequency, duration, setting, and provider.
Include both academic and functional services. Related services (e.g., speech, OT, counseling) must be listed if needed for the student to benefit from special ed.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(4)
Special Education:
Related Services:
Don't write "as needed." Services must be clearly scheduled and intentional.
Accommodations support access to grade-level curriculum. Modifications change what is expected or taught.
Match student's disability-related needs. Be documented across both instruction and assessment.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(4)
Accommodations:
Modifications:
Every accommodation listed should already be used during instruction. Don't "test-drive" them during state assessments.
Identifies which assessments (STAAR, STAAR Alt 2, TELPAS, etc.) the student will take. Documents justification if alternate assessment is chosen.
Include testing accommodations. Link choices to the student's needs, not placement or disability label.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(6)
Michael will participate in the STAAR with accommodations. He will receive:
Alternate assessment is not recommended because Michael accesses grade-level TEKS with supports.
Ensure alignment with classroom accommodations.
Describes how goal progress will be objectively tracked. Specifies reporting frequency to parents.
Must include the data collection method and report schedule (e.g., every 9 weeks).
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(3)
Progress toward annual goals will be measured through weekly teacher-created probes and quarterly curriculum-based assessments. Michael's progress will be reported to parents every 9 weeks via IEP progress reports sent with report cards.
Reports should be meaningful. Use visuals or percentages to show trends.
Required by age 14 in Texas. Based on transition assessments and student/family input.
Must include postsecondary goals and courses of study. Should address education, training, employment, and independent living as appropriate.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.320(b), TAC § 89.1055(h)
Postsecondary goal (education):
After high school, Deja will enroll in a two-year culinary arts program.
Postsecondary goal (employment):
Deja will work in a commercial kitchen or bakery with part-time support.
Independent living goal:
Deja will live with a roommate and manage her own schedule using a phone app.
Avoid generic goals like "attend college." Use specific, student-driven statements based on assessments.
ESY is not just summer school. It's about preventing regression. Must be based on data and reviewed annually.
Include ESY goals, services, and duration, if applicable. Document the decision and justification, even if ESY is not recommended.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.106, TAC § 89.1065
Deja qualifies for ESY due to significant regression in basic math skills, as shown by pre- and post-break assessment data. She will receive 3 hours/week of math intervention for 6 weeks in summer 2026 to maintain IEP goals related to budgeting and money handling.
Use teacher-collected data to show regression/recoupment, not just team opinions.
Must explain why the student is not in general ed full-time (if applicable). LRE decisions must be based on needs, not disability labels or location.
Include an LRE justification statement. Must show that the team considered supports before removal from general ed.
Legal Reference: 34 CFR § 300.114–116, 34 CFR § 300.320(a)(5)
Michael will receive reading instruction in a resource room due to his need for direct instruction in foundational reading skills. He will participate in general education for all other subjects with accommodations and support. Supplementary aids were considered but determined insufficient to support reading progress in the general education setting.
Always consider supplementary aids and services before more restrictive placements.
The IEP Coach | Professional Special Education Consulting
For more resources and support, visit us at www.theiepcoach.com
